Thursday, April 19, 2007

Bush: Be Wary of 'Abnormal Behavior'


Newsmax
Thursday, April 19, 2007

President Bush said on Thursday that mass shootings are a reminder that people must be willing to raise a red flag about others' disturbing behavior.

"One of the lessons of these tragedies is to make sure that when people see somebody or know somebody who is exhibiting abnormal behavior, you do something about it, to suggest that somebody take a look," the president said during an appearance at a high school here.

His war on terror speech came after a moment of silence for the victims of the Monday shootings at Virginia Tech in which 33 people, including the shooter, died.

In a question-and-answer session, the president was asked by a student what he thought should be done to ensure safety in schools.

He said he didn't want to draw conclusions from the Virginia case because "they're still digging out the facts." But he suggested that concerns about privacy violations, while understandable, may be preventing people from taking needed action.

Gunman Cho Seung-Hui had been accused of sending unwanted messages to two women. He was taken to a psychiatric hospital on a magistrate's orders and was pronounced a danger to himself, but was released for outpatient treatment. Also, Cho's twisted, violence-filled writings and menacing, uncommunicative demeanor had disturbed professors and students so much that he was removed from one English class and was repeatedly urged to get counseling. A video rant Cho mailed to NBC in the middle of his Virginia Tech rampage only added to the disturbing psychological portrait.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said she did not know whether Bush had seen any of the video. But it was clear he was aware of it.

"If you are a parent and your child is, you know, doing strange things on the Internet, pay attention to it and not be afraid to ask for help and not be afraid to say 'I am concerned about what I am seeing," Bush said. "I think it's very important for us not to comment until it's all said and done, but that other cases there have been warning signals - that if an adult for example had taken the signals seriously, perhaps tragedy could have been avoided."

Bush said the reeling community in Blacksburg should take heart from its support in the rest of the country.

"It really speaks to the strength of this country, doesn't it, that total strangers here in Ohio are willing to hold up people in Virginia in prayer?" he said.

~~~

CrimeWaveBush uses this Black Ops opportunity to tell us - ". . he suggested that concerns about privacy violations, while understandable, may be preventing people from taking needed action." Quite an opportunity for CrimeWaveBush and his ilk.

For once we should take CrimeWaveBush's advice and do something about CrimeWaveBush's behavior. = IMPEACH! IMPEACH!! IMPEACH!!! How many reasons does a nation need to throw off this tyrant.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Infowars.com Cartoon and Image Gallery





Smoking Is Healthier Than Fascism

Smoking Ban Is About Government Control; Believe it or not, the state really doesn't care about your health

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, January 30, 2007

The regulation of the personal habit of smoking, including new legislative moves in San Francisco to ban cigarettes in private homes, and its enforcement by an eager cadre of state snoops and snitches, represents nothing more than a move on behalf of big brother towards the complete subjugation and shackling of the individual. To this end, smoking is healthier than fascism.

Two new developments today have once again brought this issue into focus and the true agenda behind it needs to be exposed.

In France, a nation once noted as being rich in tobacco connoisseurs, 175,000 "cigarette police" have been given the task of randomly snooping around offices, schools, factories and any other "public spaces" in order to sniff out flouters of a new total ban on smoking.

In San Francisco California, a city ordinance described as "the most stringent tobacco regulation in America" would ban smoking everywhere, including private homes and apartments, sparing only large detached family homes - and if they squeeze this one through expect those homes to be targeted next.

This is not a debate about the dangers of passive smoking, we all know smoking is bad for us and those around us. On an individual level, freedom includes the right to do dumb things and whether others should be subject to our vices comes down to two questions, is fascism more unhealthy for a society than passive smoking and does the government really care about your health?

Dare I suggest that western governments raining down depleted uranium in all corners of the world, spraying chemtrails in our skies, playing Dr. Frankenstein with our food, drugging us into oblivion with psychotropic poison pills, shooting x-rays to expose our naked bodies, and injecting us with toxic vaccines really care about our physical well-being?

Do an elite that openly advocate culling the majority of the world's population really want to put a stop to cancer? The answer is no, so why the transatlantic obsession to have us stub out our cigarettes?

It's all about control, it's all about letting you know who the bosses are. If the government can regulate personal habits and behavior, what's next? If the state is so concerned about our good health as they would have you believe, why not use the latest scientific advancements to remove that nasty aggressive gene that causes so much unhappiness? Well, you're causing those around you distress and harming their health so why not? Are your political opinions a mental illness? Are they harming society? Perhaps we should ban certain types of "free" speech that is offensive to others.

You see where this is all heading - how long before our wall mounted personal x-ray body scanners are accompanied by special smoke detectors that inform on you to the local Stasi if you dare to light up?

Smoking may be very unhealthy but I'd certainly rather be around a bunch of smokers than a bunch of Fascists.

If you have never smoked and couldn't give a damn if it gets banned then consider the fact that cell phones are emerging as the new kid on the bloc as far as cancer's best friend goes. British expert Professor Lawrie Challis said last week that mobile phones could turn out to be as harmful as cigarettes. How would you react if the government suddenly announced that your Blackberry was off limits because the anti-cell phone lobby got a bill through?

We live in a paranoid world overpopulated by ninnying jellyfish who dare not dip their toe in the water in case there's a law against it, it might upset someone, or it might be bad for their health.

Writer Alan Caruba adds the following, "There are few, if any, people that do not know there is an element of risk involved in the decision to smoke. There is risk involved when any American gets into his car and goes anywhere."

"Driving kills over 40,000 Americans every year. It is the price we pay for the mobility and other benefits cars and vehicles provide. There is, in fact, risk in every human activity including the enjoyment of alcoholic beverages and even the simple act of eating."

Here are some more examples of fascism being unhealthier than smoking.

- In Omaha Nebraska, city police are encouraging residents to call 911 if they see a smoker in a non-smoking area. So when your wife is being raped by an illegal immigrant or a gang banger, be assured that the cops have a good reason for their absence - Joe Bloggs just lit up a Marlboro and he's going to get Tasered.

- Bangor City Council approved a measure that criminalizes smoking in your own car with a child present.

- In Okemos Michigan, an insurance business boss ordered all his employees to take urine tests to determine if they had smoked, even in their own homes. Smokers were warned that they would be fired.

- In New York, Mayor Bloomberg's tobacco stormtroopers raided the offices of Vanity Fair no less than three times, attempting to catch noted journalist Graydon Carter smoking. All they found was an unused clean ash tray but Carter was fined and given a warning nonetheless. Numerous other instances of infamous "ash tray raids" have occurred in New York City.

- In Scotland, social services are drawing up a master list of smokers and warning residents against smoking in their own homes unless they wish to risk being cut off from government services.

Many of the people reading this will have had relatives die directly due to smoking. I am not advocating smoking, I am simply advocating the fact that I'd rather live in a society of smokers than a society of control freak fascists who slavishly seize upon any action of the individual in order to create yet another pretext for creating a Stasi system of informants, locking us all up and building the infrastructure of the prison planet.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/300107smokingfascism.htm

~

Friday, April 6, 2007

TRUTH ACTION . ORG


ON THE ELEVENTH DAY OF EVERY MONTH TAKE ACTION
FOR 9/11 TRUTH
NATIONAL DAYS OF TRUTH ACTION

TRUTH ACTION
http://www.truthaction.org/

9/11 TRUTH UALBANY
http://www.911truthualbany.org/

LOOSE CHANGE 911
http://www.loosechange911.com/

LOOSE CHANGE II VIDEO
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change+recut
~

Wednesday, April 4, 2007

George W. Bush, Barbara Bush, and Aleister Crowley

George W. Bush, Barbara Bush, and Aleister Crowley
Saturday, April 01, 2006
Joseph Cannon / Cannonfire blogspot

"Few people understand that one of the most notorious individuals in British history may have contributed to the lineage of our current president. Aleister Crowley, a.k.a., "The Great Beast 666" -- the infamous practitioner of "sex magick" whose motto was "Do What Thou Wilt" -- came to know a great many remarkable people, including the maternal grandmother of George W. Bush. "Know," in this case, may be taken in the Biblical sense. Evidence points to the disturbing possibility that he was the true father of Barbara Bush, the former First Lady and mother to George W. Bush.

The story may seem difficult to believe at first, until one learns more about the social inter-relations that tied together these unlikely parties. Specifically, we must focus on a fascinating woman named Pauline Pierce, born Pauline Robinson -- whose third child was named Barbara.

Most sources divulge little about this woman. We learn more about her husband Marvin Pierce, the president of the McCall Corporation, which published McCall's magazine and Redbook. He married Pauline, a beautiful young socialite, in 1919. Their first child, Martha, was born the next year; the second, James, was born in 1921. At this time, Aleister Crowley inhabited what must have seemed a very different world, as he embarked upon the great communal experiment of the Abbey of Thelema in Italy.

Pauline, however, had a hidden side -- what we might call (without intending any judgment or insult) a wild side. We get a whiff of it from this Wikipedia entry:
W magazine once described her as "beautiful, fabulous, critical, and meddling" and "a former beauty from Ohio with extravagant tastes"...

Rumors that Pauline had an affair with Dwight D. Eisenhower have never been verified... Still, gossip tabloids from the '40s often associated her with prominent men in politics and film.
I have not yet been able to acquire independent confirmation of the Eisenhower liaison, although I personally see no reason to doubt that it existed. However, we may well have reason to believe that she began her "experimental" period before the 1940s.

A sixth-level initiate within the OTO (the Ordo Templi Orientis, the mystical society that Crowely came to head in the 1920s) first set me down this research path by revealing that Pauline Robinson had befriended an woman named Nellie O'Hara, an American adventuress who, at some point during her European travels, met the famed writer Frank Harris. Despite his advancing years, Harris still maintained a reputation for sexual excess that rivaled Crowley's. During this period (1919-1927), Nellie and Frank Harris lived as man and wife, although they could not actually wed because Harris' second wife was still alive and would not grant a divorce.

Harris and Crowley were good friends. Not only that: At this time, and not for the last time, Crowley was very much the proverbial "friend in need."

During the Abbey period, a Crowley follower had accidentally died during a magickal ceremony. The incident created a firestorm of unwanted publicity (the sensationalist British press labeled Crowley "The Wickedest Man in the World"), which prompted Mussolini's government to expel Crowley and his followers from Italian soil. By 1924, he lived in poverty in France, where Frank Harris kindly took him under his roof. This arrangement inevitably brought Crowley into contact with Nellie.

Crowley's diaries, to which I have been given access, clearly indicate that he depended on Harris for financial assistance:
January 3rd 1924 - "No luck about cash yet: but F.H. promises 500 fr to-morrow - so that I can bolt to Paris. One step onward to the Establishment of the Law of Thelema.
The money soon ran out, and AC (as his associates called him) soon had to ask his friend for further assistance. At this time, Harris was writing his multi-volume "erotic autobiography," My Life and Loves; he also purchased a newspaper, The Evening Telegram. But he lacked the resources and management skills to make the enterprise a success, and soon found himself in a financial position no better than Crowley's.

Despite his parlous economic circumstances, Crowley focused his attention on sex magick. Not many years previously, he and a follower named Jeanne Foster (a.k.a. Soror Hilarion) had conducted a sex-magickal rite designed to give birth to a child destined to carry on Crowley's work. I have not been able to determine whether he conducted similar experiments with Nellie, although given the polyamorous proclivities of all the parties involved, one should not discount the possibility.

Nellie's friend Pauline no doubt scandalized her social circle by traveling to France on her own and leaving two very young children in the care of nursemaids. However, her correspondence with her friend -- whose life in France with a famous literary figure must have seemed quite glamorous -- can only have inspired a sense of wanderlust. Her husband, increasingly bound to his duties with the McCall Corporation, did not share this spirit of adventure.

Thus it was that four individuals came together: Frank Harris, Nellie O'Hara, Pauline Pierce, and Aleister Crowley. Anyone who has studied Crowley's life will understand that what happened next was, in a sense, inevitable.

Crowley's diaries for this period record the initials "PVN," a cryptic reference to his favorite sexual position, which some of his partners found distasteful. (The letters derive from the Latin for "By way of the Infernal Entrance.") This is a common annotation in the records of Crowley's magical practices. We also find the strange initials "ECL." After researching the matter for some time, I have come to the conclusion that this is a reference to the practice known as "Eroto-Comotose Lucidity."

Before proceeding, I should emphasize that the year 1924 has a special significance in the Crowley chrnology. At this time, he is said to have undergone the "supreme ordeal" connected with his attainment of the Grade of Ipsissimus, the highest magickal achievement within his order. The exact nature of this ordeal remains mysterious. I believe that an important clue can be found in his description of the rite of Eroto-Comotose Lucidity:
The Candidate is made ready for the Ordeal by general athletic training, and by feasting. On the appointed day he is attended by one or more chosen and experienced attendants whose duty is (a) to exhaust him sexually by every known means (b) to rouse him sexually by every known means. Every device and artifice of the courtesan is to be employed, and every stimulant known to the physician. Nor should the attendants reck of danger, but hunt down ruthlessly their appointed prey.

Finally the Candidate will into a sleep of utter exhaustion, resembling coma, and it is now that delicacy and skill must be exquisite. Let him be roused from this sleep by stimulation of a definitely and exclusively sexual type. Yet if convenient, music wisely regulated will assist.

The attendants will watch with assiduity for signs of waking; and the moment these occur, all stimulation must cease instantly, and the Candidate be allowed to fall again into sleep; but no sooner has this happened than the former practice is resumed. This alteration is to continue indefinitely until the Candidate is in a state which is neither sleep nor waking, and in which his Spirit, set free by perfect exhaustion of the body, and yet prevented from entering the City of Sleep, communes with the Most High and the Most Holy Lord God of its being, maker of heaven and earth.

The Ordeal terminates by failure---the occurence of sleep invincible--- or by success, in which ultimate waking is followed by a final performance of the sexual act. The Initiate may then be allowed to sleep, or the practice may be renewed and persisted in until death ends all. The most favourable death is that occurring during the orgasm, and is called Mors Justi.

As it is written: Let me die the death of the Righteous, and let my last end be like his!
If he did undergo this "ordeal" in 1924, then we must presume that his key associates of that time -- including Nellie and Pauline -- functioned as his assistants.

Pauline returned to America in early October of 1924. On June 8, 1925, she gave birth to a girl named Barbara. Barbara Pierce married George H.W. Bush, who eventually became the 41st President of the United States.

But who was Barbara's father? The chronology indicates that it could have been Crowley, but it could just as easily have been Marvin Pierce. The truth regarding Crowlean sexual rituals is disclosed only to the highest initiates of the OTO, in a document misleadingly titled "Emblems and Modes of Use."

Is Aleister Crowley the father of Barbara Bush? Even she may not know for certain; indeed, I have no way of knowing whether she has ever been told that this possibility exists. However, more than one person has noted the resemblance -- and this resemblance is not just physical. Many will recall the former First Lady's haughty and thoughtless remarks in the aftermath of the Katrina disaster. Those "in the know" were reminded of Aleister Crowley's similar reaction to the loss of life which occurred during the ascent of Kangchanjunga, an expedition he commanded: "This is precisely the sort of thing with which I have no sympathy whatsoever."

I leave the matter for the reader to decide."

Monday, April 2, 2007

(Didn't Know I Was) UnAmerican


A Song by Ian Rhett
Shared Voice.org
http://www.sharedvoice.org/unamerican/index.html

Ian Rhett Videos
http://www.ianrhett.com/videos.html

From a liar to deaf ears -
"To those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this; Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve" - John Ashcroft

IMPEACH!

George Bush and Dick Cheney have lied the nation into a war of aggression, are spying in open violation of the law, and have sanctioned the use of torture. These are high crimes and misdemeanors that demand accountability through the Constitutional mechanism of impeachment. Since Congress doesn't seem to get it, we're calling on all Americans who stand for truth, freedom, and justice to join us on April 28 in spelling it out for them. Literally.

Let's put the word IMPEACH! everywhere on April 28. Some ideas people have come up with so far include: human murals (like the Beach Impeach pictured above), putting up signs on freeway overpasses, writing it on the streets with chalk, handing out cookies with it spelled out in frosting, planting flower beds in the shape of the word, spelling it out with Nathan's hot dogs on the Coney Island boardwalk, and projecting it on the sides of buildings. Then we'll all upload our photos and videos to the website, vote on our favorites, and they'll be compiled into a video for TV. So how would you like to spell it out?

We now have a place where you can find and list A28 actions. If you would like to get one going in your community, please sign up here.

And be sure to check out ImpeachSpace, our new social network where you can meet other people who support A28, make friends, share ideas, and much more. It's like MySpace, but for impeachment. Come join us at www.ImpeachSpace.com.


Participating Groups


After Downing Street
Backbone Campaign
Beachblogger.net
www.BloodForOil.org
Bostonians for the Overthrow of King George!
Center for Constitutional Rights
Citizens for Peace and Justice (Medford)
Citizens Impeachment Commission
Clothing of the American Mind
CODE PINK Women for Peace
Constitution Summer
Consumers for Peace
Democrats.com
Democracy Rising
Desert Greens, Green Party of Utah
Gold Star Families for Peace
Green Party of the United States
Hip Hop Caucus
Impeach for Peace
ImpeachInk
Impeach the President
Independent Progressive Politics Network
Justice Through Music
Liberty Tree Foundation for Democratic Revolution
Military Free Zone
National Lawyers Guild
North Carolina Green Party
North Jersey Impeach Group
Op-Critical
Patriotic Response to Renegade Govt
Peace & Justice Center of Sonoma County
People for Peace and Justice of Utah
Progressive Democrats of America
Rescue Our Democracy
Rude Mechanical Orchestra
Tampas Back Door For Impeachment of George Bush et al.
TomSongs Music and Film
Velvet Revolution
World Can't Wait

Supporting Groups
Freewayblogger.com
ImpeachBush.tv
Jerry Pippin Productions
Ministry of Love
Pledgetoimpeach.org
Progressive Blend Radio
Save the Bill of Rights Commission

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Taxing Us for Breathing

Last week, the New York Times published an extraordinary editorial complaining that "Right now, everyone is using the atmosphere like a municipal dump, depositing carbon dioxide free." The Times editors suggested that the government "start charging for the privilege" by imposing a "carbon tax."

We all knew it would eventually come to this: the New York Times thinks the government should tax us for breathing.

Of course, the editorial was supposed to be aimed at big corporations who build coal-fired power plants--but why should the logic stop there? Right now, eight million people are walking around on the streets of New York City heedlessly inhaling precious oxygen and exhaling carbon dioxide, treating the skies over their fair city "like a municipal dump, depositing carbon dioxide free." Shouldn't they be forced to pay for the "privilege," too?

And the connection is a logical one, because the generation of power by industrial-scale power plants is as much a vital activity as breathing.

I mean this in a literal, biological sense. In biology, "respiration" doesn't just refer to the act of breathing; it refers to the chemical reactions made possible by breathing. My dictionary defines this sense of "respiration" as "the processes by which a living organism or cell takes in oxygen from the air or water, distributes and utilizes it in oxidation, and gives off the products of oxidation, especially carbon dioxide." (Wikipedia has all the biochemical details.)

Sound familiar? That's right: there is no difference in principle between your cellular mitochondria and a coal-fired power plant. Our lungs take in oxygen and emit carbon dioxide so that they can provide the energy our cells use to keep us alive and to allow us to move, to grow, to thrive. Ditto for the power plants. They augment the biological process of respiration with a process you might call "industrial respiration," which we can define as follows: the processes by which a living civilization takes in fuel, distributes and utilizes it in oxidation, and gives off the products of oxidation, especially carbon dioxide.

There is an old, tired slogan used by environmentalists: that the Amazon jungle is the "lungs of the earth," because its mass of overgrown vegetation works the opposite way our lungs work: plants take in carbon dioxide and give off oxygen, so that the Amazon allegedly produces something like 20% of the world's oxygen. It turns out this isn't true. An old-growth forest like the Amazon releases more carbon dioxide, from rotting vegetation, than it absorbs. But the problem with that slogan is much deeper. It denies the fact that the real lungs of the earth--or at least, the lungs of global human civilization--are power plants. They take in fuel and turn it into the energy we use to live.

For all of their "green" pose, environmentalists don't have a genuine biological perspective on the world. They regard mankind as if we were non-biological. They talk endlessly about the "ecosystem" required for the survival of every creature on earth--but they never ask what is mankind's means of survival.

Man's primary organ of survival is his brain. We use our minds to understand the world around us, to derive scientific principles, and then to put science to work for us by rebuilding our surroundings to better suit our needs. The inscription that rings the rotunda of the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago--built in an age that had a better appreciation for progress--sums it up perfectly: "Science discerns the laws of nature. Industry applies them to the needs of man." That is the real biological imperative of human existence.

Industry is not "unnatural," not in any fundamental sense. It is the product of our biological means of survival, our minds, and it is the means by which we secure our survival and extend the reach of our action. And central to all of this is the development of "industrial respiration," the process by which we turn oil, natural gas, coal, or uranium into energy we can use.

That's why it is absurd to complain that America is "addicted" to oil. An addiction is an unhealthy dependence. So would you say that you are "addicted" to breathing, because you feel like you will die if you stop doing it? Of course not. The only difference between industrial respiration and the kind that we do with our lungs is that a human body can only use a limited quantity of energy, while the power made available to us by industrial respiration is unlimited. That's not a problem. In fact, it's the whole secret by which we rose from the cave to the skyscraper--and from the campfire to the power plant--with the result that we can now reliably stretch our lives into their eighth decades and beyond. It is the added power from industrial respiration that makes the modern human animal a healthy, vigorous, thriving organism.

That is why the environmentalist crusade against industrial power plants is so dangerous. In attempting to construct a phantom threat to our survival, the dubious theory of anthropogenic global warming, they are attempting to suppress the central source of human vitality.

What would you say if someone told you that he was concerned you might get sick because it's hot and humid out--and then told you that his "cure" was to constrict your supply of oxygen by 80%? Would you believe that he was sincerely concerned with your health? Well, you had better start asking the same question of Al Gore and the rest of the global warming fanatics, because that's exactly what they're trying to do. In denouncing fossil fuels, they are seeking to tax, reduce, and ultimately to eliminate the fuels that provide our civilization with 80% of its energy. Their goal is a fatal constriction of the process of industrial respiration.

That is the deepest, fullest reason why a "carbon tax" is just as dangerous as a tax on breathing.

If we really care about the biological health of human civilization, we need to guard it against the environmentalist charlatans who are seeking to suffocate the real lungs of the earth.

Robert Tracinski writes daily commentary at TIADaily.com. He is the editor of The Intellectual Activist and TIADaily.com.

Article from: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/03/taxing_us_for_breathing.html
~

The Great Global Warming Swindle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
~

Saturday, March 24, 2007

A New Christ


A New Christ - Wallace D. Wattles - Part 1
His Personality and His Attitude
http://www.podcastdirectory.com/podshows/1016466

A New Christ - Wallace D. Wattles - Part 2
His Teachings about Man and His Teachings about Wealth
http://www.podcastdirectory.com/podshows/1016464

A New Christ - Wallace D. Wattles - Part 3
The Apostles and their Failure and The Source of Power
http://www.podcastdirectory.com/podshows/1016458

A New Christ - Wallace D. Wattles - Part 4
Attaining Cosmic Consciousness and Demonstrations and Attainment
http://www.podcastdirectory.com/podshows/1016456


Soul Ministries
http://soulministries.podomatic.com/

Friday, March 16, 2007

36 States Appear to Agree With Ron Paul on REAL (bad) ID (ea)

"Within a week of Maine's action, lawmakers in Georgia, Wyoming, Montana, New Mexico, Vermont and Washington state also balked at Real ID. They are expected soon to pass laws or adopt resolutions declining to participate in the federal identification network."
"When the Real ID act was first offered, it was a stand alone bill. Republicans lined up behind it like good soldiers of Bush generaled by Tom Delay. Ron Paul was the most vocal opponent talking to anyone who would listen and encouraging activists to contact their representatives in congress.

Some democrats opposed Real ID, but mostly for very different reasons, not the least of which was their opposition to provisions included in Real ID that would allow completion of the San Diego border fence over certain environmental objections.

The Bill eventually was packaged with the emergency supplemental bill for Iraq war funding which meant very few in congress would oppose it lest they be branded unpatriotic.

Happily, resistance to Real ID, in spite of it's preemptive measures, seems to be gaining traction at the state level. I can't help but wonder how much is based on objection to the police state measures or how much is simply fiscal reality but i am pleased so far nonetheless.

Senator John Sununu of New Hampshire objected in the senate, has offered legislation and will supposedly do so again that would repeal REAL ID. Although it appears the Sununu repeal would likely revert to the Intelligence Reform Act Drivers License requirements which were a joint Federal and State effort, any Repeal of Real ID is a good start.

Still however, Ron Paul is the only legislator who has been willing to confront the "dirty little secret" contained within Real ID. It is a provision which requires adherence to something called the "Drivers License Agreement". The DLA is a separate agreement between states (including Mexico and Canada). The combination of the DLA and Real ID results in the requirement that driver's information (as determined by the Department of Homeland Security not by congress - which could include social security number, personal data, biometric or any other data deemed necessary) be databased not only nationally but linked with the government databases of Mexico and Canada.

With the more recent publicity given to the NAFTA Super Highway, speculation regarding a possible tri-national currency and the Bush administration's seemingly out of line stance on border security / immigration, it should now be clear that Real ID was not about keeping Americans safe. Instead it was one piece of a supranational puzzle intended to provide a means to keep control of an expanded global populace.

Time and again Ron Paul has taken unpopular but principled positions which have been vindicated by history. Standing firm on matters of sovereignty and personal liberty, he has added Real ID to the list."

From - Ron Paul for President Blog
http://ronpaul.rescue-us.org/2007/02/07/update-36-states-now-appear-to-agree-with-paul-on-real-bad-id-ea.aspx
http://www.rescue-us.org/

DEMOCRACY OR REPUBLIC WHICH IS IT?

By Benedict D. LaRosa
Although we hear the term democracy used constantly in reference to our form of government, the word does not appear in either the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States, or two fundamental documents. Indeed, article IV, section 4, of the Constitution "guarantees
to every State in this union a Republican Form of Government." In addition, we sing the Battle Hymn of the Republic, and pledge allegiance to the flag of "the republic for which it stands."

On the contrary, the founders saw great danger in democracy. Tom Paine, that firebrand of the American Revolution, considered democracy the vilest form of government. In describing the purpose of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph commented:
"The general object was to provide a cure for the evils under which the United States labored; that in tracing these evils to their origin, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy."

Thirty eight years after the declaration of Independence, john Adams warned:
"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy that did not commit suicide."

John Marshall, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835 observed:
'Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos."

As late as 1928, the "Citizenship" chapter of U.S. War Department training manual TM 2000-25 expressed the opinion: "Democracy . . . has been repeatedly tried without succes. Our Constitutional fathers . . . made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy . . . and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic.

Full article here or click heading for link
http://www.devvy.com/pdf/larosa/larosa_democracy_or_republic.pdf